Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

Support for LGBTQ+ protections is tied to politics more than population

About 1 in 10 Americans identify as LGBTQ+, according to new data from PRRI — a bit more than Gallup measured in similar polling last year.

PRRI’s data, though, offer an insight that Gallup didn’t: the size of the LGBTQ+ population in each state. Only about 4 percent of South Carolina residents indicated that they were LGBTQ+, the lowest percentage of any state. The highest percentage was in New Mexico, where an estimated 16 percent of residents fall into that category.

Those well-versed in politics might not be surprised by this. South Carolina is a conservative state and New Mexico a liberal one, so that tracks. But one state tied for the third-highest percentage of LGBTQ+ residents was very red Nebraska; very blue Hawaii was tied at the bottom for 46th place.

In fact, PRRI didn’t find much of a correlation between a state’s LGBTQ+ population and its politics. Members of that community were much more likely to say they were Democrats than Republicans (again, as you might expect), but because only 1 in 10 Americans are LGBTQ+, that doesn’t drive the overall political identity of the state.

PRRI also asked respondents whether they support legal protections for LGBTQ+ Americans. The idea had wide support, with about three-quarters of Americans expressing support for the idea. Interestingly, the level of support in a state wasn’t correlated with the size of the LGBTQ+ population.

You can see that below. We might expect that, as the LGBTQ+ population in a state increases, so does support for legal protections. Instead, we see a big cloud of states, some with large LGBTQ+ populations that are lukewarm on protections and some with relatively small populations that heavily support the idea.

But notice what happens if we color each state by its 2020 presidential vote. Now you see that most of the states toward the top — more supportive of protections — are blue, meaning they voted for President Biden. Most at the bottom are red.

In fact, if we compare the level of support for legal protections to the 2020 vote margin, we see an actual correlation. States that voted more heavily for Biden — and Utah — are more supportive of protections.

In the abstract, this makes sense. Democrats are much more supportive of those protections than Republicans, PRRI found, and states with more Democrats voted more heavily for Biden. Again, the scale of the LGBTQ+ population in any given state is modest enough that it constitutes only a fraction of the electorate.

It is nonetheless striking that the best predictor of support for protecting LGBTQ+ Americans against discrimination isn’t the percentage of LGBTQ+ people in the state. It’s the percentage of Democrats.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.







    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News





    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    Investing

    The Senate is expected to send a temporary spending package known as a Continuing Resolution (CR) to the White House, averting a government shutdown before...

    Economy

    In the final three weeks of the presidential race, former president Donald Trump and his advisers have attacked one particular foe more than three...

    Investing

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville’s, R-Ala., colleagues pleaded on the Senate floor early Thursday morning – from midnight until nearly 4 a.m. – to drop his objection to...

    Latest News

    A bipartisan ethics report concludes there is “substantial evidence” that George Santos violated federal criminal laws, which will almost certainly trigger another attempt to...